LOLThe state doesn't give us anything. The rights were simply enumerated.
Your right to defend yourself is bestowed upon you when you are instantiated.
While I believe my base class to include this right as well, the state has thus far overloaded the 2A operator with a null pointer... As of yet the linter has not detected this and a segfault is occurring when the function is referenced...
Showing posts with label Law. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Law. Show all posts
Saturday, March 07, 2009
Geeks do the 2nd Amendment
As posted on an internet board:
Thursday, June 26, 2008
It's About Time
Supreme Court Strikes Down D.C. Gun Ban, Upholds Individual Right to Keep and Bear Arms
The question now is what effect this will have on now unconstitutional gun control rules and regulations in various cities and states, and when. Here are the Massachusetts laws that I think could and should be affected and invalidated by this ruling:
The last question is "How could 4 justices dissent?!?" Clearly gun control is a matter of ideology bordering on religion for them, not law. Sad.
Go to SCOTUSBlog for more discussion and analysis.
*MGL references from www.goal.org
"Writing for the majority, Justice Antonin Scalia said that an individual right to bear arms is supported by "the historical narrative" both before and after the Second Amendment was adopted."Some are saying that one of the unanswered questions is whether this ruling incorporates the 2nd Amenedment against the states. Some claim it did not, but other analysis indicates it rather clearly does. My reading leans toward the later.
The question now is what effect this will have on now unconstitutional gun control rules and regulations in various cities and states, and when. Here are the Massachusetts laws that I think could and should be affected and invalidated by this ruling:
- Assault Weapon Ban (C.140: S. 131M):
- "Consumer Protection"-based Handgun Ban (C.140: S. 123)
- Discretionary and Restrictive Licensing (C.140: S. 131)
- Mandatory Locks for Sales (C.140: S. 123)
- Mandatory Storage (C.140: S. 131L)
- Transportation Restrictions (C.269: S. 12D, C.140: S. 131C (a), (b), C.140: S. 121, C.269: S. 10 (m), , C. 140: S. 131C)*
The last question is "How could 4 justices dissent?!?" Clearly gun control is a matter of ideology bordering on religion for them, not law. Sad.
Go to SCOTUSBlog for more discussion and analysis.
*MGL references from www.goal.org
Wednesday, August 15, 2007
Ends and Means Mismatch
or
This is utterly disgusting, and I am not talking about O.J., that's a given. This time it is the Goldman family. They have called the book "disgusting" and "morally reprehensible" yet when the opportunity arises to make some money off of it they jump on the chance to make profit from the death of their son.
Publishing the book does nothing to punish O.J. He is already a pariah. The money to be made by publishing this book is not coming out of his pocket. It won't reduce his current income at all, nor will it affect his life in any noticeable way.
Give it up. Take the high road. The money to be made will not bring Ron back. It will not punish his murderer. All it does is tarnish the memory of your son. Take the manuscript and burn it as an offering at the grave of your son. That's all it's good for.
The Goldman's Money-Grubbing Ways
I heard the report on the radio this morning that the Goldman family had reached a deal to get OJ's book published: Beaufort Books to publish OJ Simpson book.This is utterly disgusting, and I am not talking about O.J., that's a given. This time it is the Goldman family. They have called the book "disgusting" and "morally reprehensible" yet when the opportunity arises to make some money off of it they jump on the chance to make profit from the death of their son.
Publishing the book does nothing to punish O.J. He is already a pariah. The money to be made by publishing this book is not coming out of his pocket. It won't reduce his current income at all, nor will it affect his life in any noticeable way.
Give it up. Take the high road. The money to be made will not bring Ron back. It will not punish his murderer. All it does is tarnish the memory of your son. Take the manuscript and burn it as an offering at the grave of your son. That's all it's good for.
Saturday, June 09, 2007
There is a God - Part 2
Paris Hilton Ordered Back to Jail
Judge Sauer strikes a blow against "celebrity (in)justice". Way to go your honor!
Judge Sauer strikes a blow against "celebrity (in)justice". Way to go your honor!
Monday, June 04, 2007
It's About Time!
"Feds say La. congressman to be indicted"
I wonder what they were waiting for, the start of hurricane season?
I wonder what they were waiting for, the start of hurricane season?
Saturday, January 13, 2007
Why I Support the Death Penalty
"Two missing boys, one since 2002, found in Missouri". I believe in the existence of true evil, and truly evil people, in this world. Very few people qualify. In my opinion killers and kidnappers of children do.
Such people should, to borrow a line, be "decently tried, decently convicted and decently executed". Mr Devlin is one of these people. He should get no plea bargains, no insanity defenses and no delaying appeals. If he wants to be spared a trial then he can plead guilty, but he should get punished the same: Death.
I don't care how he's executed; fried, hung, shot or medicated: I consider Mr Devlins presence in this world forfeit.
Such people should, to borrow a line, be "decently tried, decently convicted and decently executed". Mr Devlin is one of these people. He should get no plea bargains, no insanity defenses and no delaying appeals. If he wants to be spared a trial then he can plead guilty, but he should get punished the same: Death.
I don't care how he's executed; fried, hung, shot or medicated: I consider Mr Devlins presence in this world forfeit.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
